<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uzair's Weblog &#187; Entrepreneurial-ness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/category/entrepreneurial-ness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uzair.nairang.org</link>
	<description>Where Uzairs Roam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 12:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dean Kamen on Innovators</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2009/01/13/dean-kamen-on-innovators/</link>
		<comments>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2009/01/13/dean-kamen-on-innovators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uzair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurial-ness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something worth hanging on to for rainy days:

Kamen &#8230; said every entrepreneurial innovator he&#8217;s ever seen shares a few characteristics.

&#8220;It&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re brilliant or well-educated,&#8221; Kamen said. &#8220;They work all the time. They don&#8217;t let failure demoralize or destroy them. They pick themselves up and keep going and eventually, every once in a while, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/worklife/01/12/entrepreneur.psychology/index.html?eref=rss_latest">Something</a> worth hanging on to for rainy days:</p>

<blockquote><p>Kamen &#8230; said every entrepreneurial innovator he&#8217;s ever seen shares a few characteristics.</p>

<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re brilliant or well-educated,&#8221; Kamen said. &#8220;They work all the time. They don&#8217;t let failure demoralize or destroy them. They pick themselves up and keep going and eventually, every once in a while, one of your ideas actually breaks through and works, and it makes all that stuff seem worthwhile.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p>In other words, Mr. Kamen agrees with Ammi :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2009/01/13/dean-kamen-on-innovators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wow Day</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2008/08/03/wow-day/</link>
		<comments>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2008/08/03/wow-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uzair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurial-ness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have 3 Wows to give out today.


WhyNot.net: I was Googling to see if anyone else was curious about using active noise-cancelling techniques for turning down the volume (in some sense) on babies. There are serious technical challenges (such as that current noise-cancelling devices target a point sink), but it&#8217;s a cool idea and even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 3 Wows to give out today.</p>

<ul>
<li><p><a href="http://www.whynot.net">WhyNot.net</a>: I was Googling to see if anyone else was curious about using active noise-cancelling techniques for turning down the volume (in some sense) on babies. There are serious technical challenges (such as that current noise-cancelling devices target a point sink), but it&#8217;s a cool idea and even if you could get a 50% effective system, it would be immensely useful. And profitable. Anyway, Google turned <a href="http://www.whynot.net/ideas/1188">this up</a>. It&#8217;s a bit disappointing that this is another idea that someone&#8217;s already thought of, but on the other hand it&#8217;s cool to be able to read the comments and see useful extensions (eg, this would be a godsend for snorers&#8217; spouses). The website&#8217;s like a catalogue of people&#8217;s if-onlys and what-ifs &#8212; a goldmine for potential entrepreneurs.</p></li>
<li><p><a href="http://www.bookmooch.com">BookMooch</a>: This one has me seriously excited. I have a bunch of books that I have to lug every time I change flats. I really like most of them but haven&#8217;t really picked them up since I first read them. BookMooch is a community of people just like that who are happy to exchange books with each other. Last night, for instance, I got online and listed the 20 or so books I&#8217;m willing to give away, and requested a math book that someone in Illinois has. This morning, my inbox had an &#8216;accepted&#8217; message from the Illinois dude and 4 requests for my books (one from New Zealand!). You might argue sending the book to NZ will pretty much offset whatever money I saved by getting the math book for free, but there&#8217;s a larger point here: this is far more efficient than stockpiling books that one never reads. And in return, I get access to a pool of books that might not be available in local bookstores, or even be out of print. Of course, countries like Pakistan have a very active second-hand book market where one can often exchange books with minimal friction/costs so this might prove less useful, but here in the UK, the second-hand book scene is much more limited. There&#8217;s an analogy to zakat (and more specifically, keeping money circulating in the economy) taking shape in my head that I think is appropriate; also, it appeases my burgeoning sense of eco- and anti-consumerist responsibility.</p></li>
<li><p>The final Wow will be shared between <a href="http://www.colinux.org">coLinux</a> and <a href="http://www.andlinux.org">andLinux</a>. coLinux compiled the Linux kernel to run on Windows, where it&#8217;s hosted as a guest operating system with virtualised access to your hardware. It&#8217;s a really cool idea and its performance is pretty impressive. I haven&#8217;t run anything really heavy (ie, OpenOffice), but the things I have run (Perl, Octave, Vim) run superbly well on my Centrino 1.6/1.25GB. The caveat in that last sentence isn&#8217;t even that much of a problem for me, since I already have MS Office and am not interested in OO. andLinux built on the coLinux base to provide an easily installable package (2 packages actually: KDE (!) and XFCE). Installation was light and problem-free, and now I can install any additional packages I want with Synaptic. Unlike VMWare, I don&#8217;t start the VM manually, and while idle the resource consumption is completely unnoticeable. I have a nice auto-hiding XFCE bar from which I can bring up a terminal or launch the file explorer and that&#8217;s that. Linux the way I always wanted it: on my terms, and as I need it.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>BTW, my laptop is falling apart. Seriously: it&#8217;s cracked in two places, scratched all over, the palmrests are a little worn down, and now the USB and power ports are starting to get loose. It&#8217;s lasted 4 years without a single hitch though, which I think is serious testament to how solid Fujitsu machines are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2008/08/03/wow-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avanoo &#8212; I don&#8217;t get it</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/06/09/avanoo-i-dont-get-it/</link>
		<comments>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/06/09/avanoo-i-dont-get-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uzair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurial-ness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekistry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/06/09/avanoo-i-dont-get-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These guys wrote this, a thinly veiled dig at Guy Kawasaki. It&#8217;s a great read, and got me curious as to what exactly it was that they were doing. Their idea can be summarised as Epinions with filtering: people ask questions, which are answered by other people, and then the answers can be sorted and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.avanoo.com">These guys</a> wrote <a href="http://wisdomofcommunities.com/2007/06/08/dont-be-a-dude-yamaha-a-gripping-story-of-life-and-death-in-silicon-valley/">this</a>, a thinly veiled dig at <a href="http://www.guykawasaki.com/">Guy Kawasaki</a>. It&#8217;s a great read, and got me curious as to what exactly it was that they were doing. Their idea can be summarised as <a href="http://www.epinions.com/">Epinions</a> with filtering: people ask questions, which are answered by other people, and then the answers can be sorted and filtered by, for example, how old the respondent is or where they&#8217;re from. <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/23/avanoo-a-community-wisdom-bank/">VentureBeat</a> has a good review of them, and I generally agree with their take, which is that it&#8217;s ambitious but could be an interesting experiment.</p>

<p>Still, I don&#8217;t see it as a viable business. And I certainly don&#8217;t see it as a $4 million business, which is roughly what their angel investors must think it&#8217;s worth to hand over $400,000. Keep in mind, they&#8217;re headed into a crowded playfield and their differentiating feature is not protected IP. So, basically, Epinions or eHow or AllExperts or whoever could take their <em>existing</em> databank and just layer on datamining to get a filtering mechanism at least as effective as Avanoo. That&#8217;s not to say there isn&#8217;t potential here, but given that their business model is based entirely around advertising, you&#8217;d have to be really optimistic to figure this is anything more than a startup in a niche that is fairly well-saturated already.</p>

<p>Of course, if I were Avanoo&#8217;s founders, I wouldn&#8217;t be so worried about AllExperts/Epinions/whoever as I would be about Facebook. Their <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/">applications platform</a> is going to absolutely kill a whole lot of advertising-based websites by providing features within the comfortable confines of Facebook that users would previously have had to head to various individual websites for. Web 2.0&#8217;s social networking boom is firmly in the convergence and consolidation stage now, and that&#8217;s just the plain truth.</p>

<p>One final note: I really can&#8217;t see what they need $400,000 for. It&#8217;s a fairly basic community website with some data mining thrown in. They&#8217;re not inventing the data mining algorithms and if they&#8217;re smart they&#8217;re not even implementing them, so all they they need right now is rent and food money and a couple hundred bucks a month for a dedicated server somewhere. This is a classic Y-Combinator project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/06/09/avanoo-i-dont-get-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I want</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/05/19/what-i-want/</link>
		<comments>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/05/19/what-i-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uzair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurial-ness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/05/19/what-i-want/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve become a pretty heavy del.icio.us user (lookie-loo, my bookmarks for all to see &#8211;>). It&#8217;s wonderfully convenient having them available from any computer I&#8217;m at, and one less thing to worry about backing up; since 2000, I think I&#8217;ve lost locally stored bookmarks about 4 times. Plus, they&#8217;re tagged any way you want them, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve become a pretty heavy <a href="http://www.del.icio.us">del.icio.us</a> user (lookie-loo, my bookmarks for all to see &#8211;>). It&#8217;s <em>wonderfully</em> convenient having them available from any computer I&#8217;m at, and one less thing to worry about backing up; since 2000, I think I&#8217;ve lost locally stored bookmarks about 4 times. Plus, they&#8217;re tagged any way you want them, which makes them much more searchable than in-browser bookmarks. And of course, the Web 2.0 aspect of all this is that your bookmarks are immediately shareable in an easy, manageable way.</p>

<p>What converted me, though, was the awesome <a href="http://del.icio.us/help/firefox/extensionnew">Firefox extension</a>, which makes del.icio.us bookmarks behave <em>exactly</em> like in-browser bookmarks. It&#8217;ll even recommend tags based on your existing bookmarks, which means bookmarking remains an exercise in clicking, rather than forcing you to think and typing in tags. (Eww, thinking&#8230;)</p>

<p>So, I&#8217;m relatively happy. Except for one little thing: archiving bookmarks. I was a <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a> user for a while as well, and while the juvenility (it&#8217;s a word; I checked) of the community proved irritating, <a href="http://www.duggmirror.com">DuggMirror</a> was one of the highlights. It&#8217;s common sense, really: when you have a social news website Digg that routinely sends massive waves of traffic at unsuspecting websites, it&#8217;s a good idea to archive the page somewhere (ie, take a snapshot and store it on a different server) so that if the website goes down, you have a mirror to point people to. This is one of the things that Slashdot really missed &#8212; sure, Coral/Google/WaybackMachine archives existed, but it was always a bit of a lottery whether they would have the page you wanted, particularly if it was a news page that had just become available.</p>

<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s what I want for del.icio.us (they&#8217;ve got <a href="http://www.delicious.com">delicious.com</a> as well if you find the punctuation irritating). I&#8217;m a pretty committed bookmarker, and oftentimes (<a href="http://www.answers.com/oftentimes&amp;r=67">apparently also a word</a>&#8230;I blame Amreekans) worry about my bookmarks disappearing. The New York Times, for example, requires a password for articles older than a couple of weeks. There are also transient pages, such as expiring auctions (useful for making comparisons at a later date).</p>

<p>There are bound to be copyright implications, but I doubt it would be a big deal if you only made the pages available to users who bookmarked them (ie, I wouldn&#8217;t be able to retrieve pages that you archived); in that case, it would be identical to saving a copy of an article on your hard disk (which I also do&#8230;and which has resulted in a 50MB folder of HTML pages I have never accessed again).</p>

<p>Given the sheer number of del.icio.us users, I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s some pretty serious Adsense moolah to be made here. Until I get time to do it (or hear of someone else who&#8217;s done it already &#8212; I honestly don&#8217;t care either way, I just want this available), I guess I&#8217;ll just have to make do with <a href="http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/08/28/errorzilla-useful-error-pages-for-firefox/">Errorzilla</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/05/19/what-i-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grr&#8230;ClickTale</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/01/22/grrclicktale/</link>
		<comments>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/01/22/grrclicktale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uzair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurial-ness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geekistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/01/22/grrclicktale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Argh, I&#8217;m getting sick of this. I came across ClickTale today, an Israeli startup that provides really detailed web analytics for websites. They offer webmasters the opportunity to track every click and keystroke a user makes on a webpage, and they even compile those sessions into videos that you can watch to see how the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh, I&#8217;m getting sick of this. I came across <a href="http://www.clicktale.com/">ClickTale</a> today, an Israeli startup that provides really detailed web analytics for websites. They offer webmasters the opportunity to track every click and keystroke a user makes on a webpage, and they even compile those sessions into videos that you can watch to see how the user interacts with your webpage.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about something almost identical (though targetted at a different audience) for several months now. Of course, it isn&#8217;t like this is rocket science: they&#8217;ve basically done a lot of grunt work to write some very elaborate Javascript that you can insert into your website&#8217;s template, which will then send an async packet (we&#8217;re AJAX haxors!) back to the server every time the the mouse moves, or there&#8217;s a click or a keystroke, or the page scrolls. The server then compiles this information into meaningful statistics. Combining this data with the URL of the page makes it simple to recreate the user&#8217;s session as a video.</p>

<p>Hmm. Actually, their website says it&#8217;s &#8220;a hosted service, so no installation on the server or client is needed&#8221;, which maybe a deliberate attempt to throw off competitors. I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re in any real danger of having someone simply replicate the async packet sending and offer that as a competitor &#8212; the sheer amount of data this thing is going to generate is going to make it completely useless unless they generate quality stats that are human-comprehensible.</p>

<p>Returning to the point, I think this is another reminder I need to get my act together and start implementing the Grand Idea. There was <a href="http://digg.com/programming/Digg_com_created_for_only_200_00">a story yesterday</a> about how Kevin Rose created Digg for just $200 by employing a freelance PHP guy. Maybe I need to stop being possessive and admit I don&#8217;t have enough time to devote to this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/01/22/grrclicktale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
