<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Female&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/</link>
	<description>Where Uzairs Roam</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uzair</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/#comment-16208</link>
		<dc:creator>Uzair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/#comment-16208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Reductionist -- exactly. The more I think about this, the more I feel man-made systems (capitalism, socialism, etc.) tend to extremes instead of sensible mayana-ravi, simply because they're open to interpretation and modification.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reductionist &#8212; exactly. The more I think about this, the more I feel man-made systems (capitalism, socialism, etc.) tend to extremes instead of sensible mayana-ravi, simply because they&#8217;re open to interpretation and modification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/#comment-16052</link>
		<dc:creator>A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/#comment-16052</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;yeah - i second SMA.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and also, I am confused about the pc terms for this stuff. Apparently, asking for 'gender' on a form is non-pc and 'sex' (which sounds odd to me) is better. Perhaps the idea is to employ the most reductionist-scientific terminology so as to somehow convey only the fact without any nuances about sexual orientation, etc etc. Dunno. I like more polite and less 'animal' words too... how can you ignore the linguistic aspects of civilization in human interaction?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah - i second SMA.</p>
<p>and also, I am confused about the pc terms for this stuff. Apparently, asking for &#8216;gender&#8217; on a form is non-pc and &#8217;sex&#8217; (which sounds odd to me) is better. Perhaps the idea is to employ the most reductionist-scientific terminology so as to somehow convey only the fact without any nuances about sexual orientation, etc etc. Dunno. I like more polite and less &#8216;animal&#8217; words too&#8230; how can you ignore the linguistic aspects of civilization in human interaction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMA</title>
		<link>http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/#comment-16040</link>
		<dc:creator>SMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uzair.nairang.org/articles/2007/07/13/female/#comment-16040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You finally posted something! Yay!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You finally posted something! Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.091 seconds -->
